bruno' s images in 2010

This is a place for members to post on-going topics about their plants and experiences.
User avatar
bruno
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:02 pm
Location: rome

Post by bruno »

just a few additions
Echinomastus mariposensis

Image

Echinomastus intertextus var. dasyacanthus

Image

Escobaria robbinsorum

Image

Escobaria albicolumnaria

Image
bruno
daiv
Site Admin
Posts: 23625
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:15 pm
Location: Long Prairie, MN
Contact:

Post by daiv »

Bruno,
New plants in your collection? Or just new flowers for the year?

Either way, they do not get much better than those!

Daiv
All Cacti are succulents, but not all succulents are Cacti
peterb
Posts: 9516
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:19 am
Location: Chandler, Arizona, USA

Post by peterb »

Wow! Love that robbinsorum. what beautiful plants as usual!

peterb
Zone 9
iann
Posts: 17184
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:10 pm
Location: England

Post by iann »

Neat Escobarias and Escobaria look-alikes :wink:
--ian
User avatar
bruno
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:02 pm
Location: rome

Post by bruno »

just new flowers for the year Daiv, with a few others to come :D

Thank you Peter, mariposensis is over 16en years now, after I lost acunensis the oldest Echinomastus here ..
iann wrote:Neat Escobarias and Escobaria look-alikes :wink:


I remember Hester's comment about mariposensis being more like an Escobaria than other Echinomastus and others saying seedlings are almost indistinguishable from young Escobaria tuberculosa....

All worth growing gems, insn' t it?

ciao
bruno
User avatar
bruno
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:02 pm
Location: rome

Post by bruno »

Could you say this is a cactus? Yes, it is Tephrocactus malyanus, a brand new addition here. Do you know anything of this plant?

Image

The first flowers of Stenocactus coptogonus from seed

Image


can you id this Stenocactus?

Image

Echinomastus durangensis with red, alien spiders, do you know such insects? They are harmless for plants and I was told they predate rsm...

Image

Gymnocactus horripilus

Image

Gymnocactus subterraneus var. zaragozae

Image

Pelcyphoras in full bloom

Image

Image

Image

flowers&spines

Thelocactus nidulans

Image

Mammillaria hertrichiana
Image

Mammillaria pectinifera

Image

Mammillaria roseoalba

Image

a better view of Escobaria robbinsorum

Image

last, Turbinicarpus pseudomacrochele, the flower bigger than the plant .... Image

Hope you enjoy :D

Buona notte
bruno
CactusJordi
Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:01 am
Location: SoCal

Post by CactusJordi »

bruno wrote:...
last Neowerdermannia volverki looks close to flowering :wink:
hope you enjoy...ciao
Yes, I did too!
But please start spelling the Neowerdermannia vorwerkii

Jordi
daiv
Site Admin
Posts: 23625
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:15 pm
Location: Long Prairie, MN
Contact:

Post by daiv »

I know that Tephro as Austrocylindropuntia lagopus.

This has got to be my favorite picture in the New Cactus Lexicon picture atlas. Anyone who has the NCL should turn to page 457. :shock:

Bruno - you need to get a bigger pot! :P
All Cacti are succulents, but not all succulents are Cacti
User avatar
hegar
Posts: 4596
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 4:04 am
Location: El Paso, Texas

Post by hegar »

Bruno, those are magnificent plants you have. I was most surprised by the grouping of the Pelecyphora spp.. I do recognize the first two plants, but what kind of plant is that "hairy one"? Is that some special cultivar of Pelecyphora?

Harald
User avatar
bruno
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:02 pm
Location: rome

Post by bruno »

You are right Jordi, apologies for the confusion.

Daiv I am wondering whether I should edit the post, what do you think?

BTW do you know of Neowerdermannia chilensis? Is somebody growing this species?

Thank you Daiv, it is a graft, yes I' ll give it bigger pot.

Hi Harald, that is a plain P. strobiliformis, don' t remember if it comes with a fn, I' ll look into it and let you know

Ciao
bruno
daiv
Site Admin
Posts: 23625
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:15 pm
Location: Long Prairie, MN
Contact:

Post by daiv »

bruno wrote: Daiv I am wondering whether I should edit the post, what do you think?

Thank you Daiv, it is a graft, yes I' ll give it bigger pot.
Yes, you can just click the "Edit" button to change any of your post.

Do you have the New Cactus Lexicon? The picture in there shows a plant that is several meters across. That is why I said get a bigger pot - so you can get huge mound like that! :o
All Cacti are succulents, but not all succulents are Cacti
User avatar
bruno
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:02 pm
Location: rome

Post by bruno »

Done Daiv, thanks.

Yes I have the NCL, I' ll take a look tonight

Ciao
bruno
daiv
Site Admin
Posts: 23625
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:15 pm
Location: Long Prairie, MN
Contact:

Post by daiv »

bruno wrote: Yes I have the NCL, I' ll take a look tonight
OK, let me know what you think. That should be the goal for your plant! :wink:
All Cacti are succulents, but not all succulents are Cacti
User avatar
bruno
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:02 pm
Location: rome

Post by bruno »

Huge :shock:
sure I don' t have a pot like that :D

Just an instance of how wonderful a cactus can be. I saw malyana is merged into lagopus, in the book Studies in the Opuntioideae, Iliff reports the they live pretty high (4000 and 4500 mt) and differ only in stems of malyana being narrower and giving rise to more compact clumps. The close up in NCL is quite impressive, thank you for driving me there :wink:

ciao
bruno
daiv
Site Admin
Posts: 23625
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:15 pm
Location: Long Prairie, MN
Contact:

Post by daiv »

Bruno,
I'm glad you checked it out. It made such an impression on me when I saw that. I wonder how old it is.

Well even if yours doesn't get that big, a real plant is still better than a picture!

Daiv
All Cacti are succulents, but not all succulents are Cacti
Post Reply