Double-blind peer review is a process used by academic journals to ensure articles submitted for publication are fairly reviewed by experts in the field. In this process, both the authors' and the reviewers' identities are hidden from each other.
Apr 2, 2024
People also ask
What is the double-blind peer review method?
What is the difference between double-blind and triple blind peer review?
What is double-blind peer review in psychology?
What are the rules of double-blind review?
Aug 29, 2024 · Double-blind peer review means the identity of both the author and reviewer is kept hidden. If the authors' identity is unknown to the ...
Sep 5, 2023 · However, the reviewers know who the authors are. Whereas, double-blind peer review, is when neither authors nor reviewers know each other's ...
Double-blinding adds considerable work for authors and editorial staff and has no positive effect on review quality.
Jul 10, 2024 · A double blind peer review process is when your article is sent to reviewers without disclosing your name and address or affiliation. In this ...
Mar 9, 2018 · Using data from ACM WSDM'17, A. Tomkins et al. showed that double blind reviewers are less likely than single blind reviewers to accept papers ...
Sep 22, 2020 · In double-blind peer review, both the authors and reviewers keep their anonymity. Only the editor knows the identity of all parties involved.
Oct 24, 2023 · In double-blind peer review neither authors nor reviewers know the identity of the others. Double-blinding should reduce the status bias and ...
Jun 27, 2023 · The blinding during the review process is there to protect the reviewers from retaliation. It sounds like you want to know who was rude to you ...
The three most common types of peer review are single-anonymized, double-anonymized, and open peer review.